Vaccinaties, helpen ze... of schaden ze...?

Gekopieerd van een nieuwsbrief. Lees het en trek zelf een conclusie. Het is het Engels, maar makkelijk te lezen. Ik veroordeel niemand, ik probeer te laten zien dat er ook andere ideeën zijn over vaccineren, cijfers, onderzoeken etc. Onderop staan bronvermeldingen van links etc. Kijk ook eens op http://www.nvkp.nl/ een Nederlandse site die ook kritische vragen stelt m.b.t. bij het vaccineringsprogramma.

Do Vaccines help or harm?

The vaccination story takes much longer to tell than just one small chapter in a book. So I am not going to try to prove anything to you, but rather give you some important information to consider, very important.


The first thing you might check for yourself is the latest controversy now on TV at this date of 1/6/20011. Dr. Andrew Wakefield, MB, BS, FRCS, FRCPath, is an academic gastroenterologist; he is a completely conventional doctor being worked over by CNN trying to prove that he is a liar because he is saying autism is caused by vaccines. They are saying he faked the data. They have to say that, as there is no opposing data. CNN tries to appear unbiased, but they spend a minute or two on his actual data and then ten times as much time talking about how he has been accused of lying. CNN personnel are extremely unprofessional and irresponsible to claim he is lying when they have no proof.


The first thing you should notice is that if you go to the internet and read about vaccinations, you will find many learned people writing about it. You will notice that each of these people is saying that vaccination is absolutely a great thing. Doctor after doctor will tell you that vaccination has reduced the incidence of many infectious diseases. Just look at the extremely high percentage of infectious disease around 1900, they say, and now, after the advent of vaccination, those diseases have all dropped to tiny, almost insignificant percentages of what they had been.  Although each of these people will confirm the tremendous value of vaccinations and talk about the scientific proof and the huge field of scientific evidence, there is in fact no scientific proof. Again there are all those missing scientific papers.


Measles as an Example

But let me help you check if for yourself. Take measles as an example. In 1900 there were 13 deaths for each 100,000 population. By 1963 there was less than 1 death per 100,000 population. With the proper chart, that can be made to look good for vaccination, but you may have guessed it, vaccination for measles was introduced in 1963. After it was introduced, the number of deaths continued to decline, but not significantly, and not at any accelerated speed. There are no graphs that prove there was a big reduction in measles deaths after the introduction of measles vaccines. The decrease in measles deaths matched the improved living conditions of the cities, the better nutrition, the improved trash collection and waste disposal. The exact same thing happened in England and Europe. Nor was it just measles -- all the infectious diseases have a similar graphs. The tremendous reduction in disease followed modern civilization in the improvement of living conditions and hygiene. No disease incidence graph shows any particular reduction in deaths after the introduction of its vaccine.


To illustrate this, let me give you a picture of New York in about 1900. Keep in mind that all cities were described the same way at that time. I quote Roman Bystrianyk in her article Historic Data Shows Vaccines Not Key in Declines of Death from Disease.


“Now imagine a world where workplaces had no health, safety, or minimum wage laws. It was a time where people put in 12 to 16 hours a day at the most tedious menial labor. Imagine bands of children roaming the streets out of control because their parents are laboring long days. Picture the city of New York surrounded not by suburbs, but by rings of smoldering garbage dumps and shantytowns. Imagine cities where hogs, horses, and dogs and their refuse were commonplace in the streets. Many infectious diseases were rampant throughout the world and in particular in the large cities. This is not a description of the third world, but was a large portion of America and other western cities only a century or so ago.”


The decline of disease in every case came from hundreds of societal improvements, such as:

  • The invention of sewers

  • Advancements and Education in Personal Hygiene

  • Improved living conditions

  • Improved working conditions

  • Better garbage disposal

  • Cleaning of refuse from the streets


The decline in incidence of each disease came before the advent of its vaccination, with the exception of smallpox. However, there is no proof that smallpox vaccinations helped. For years in England, hundreds died from smallpox vaccinations and only one or two from smallpox each year. Despite strict vaccination laws a hundred years ago, with thousands vaccinated, hundreds of thousands nevertheless died from smallpox. The doctors and drug companies would like you to think (and maybe even a few of them have convinced themselves) that vaccinations are responsible for the reduction in deaths. They produce statistics that would convince a master thief, but they simply cannot compete with the truth and facts.


Some True Disease Statistics

There is currently an epidemic of Type 2 diabetes in progress. One in 100 children have autism. Further:

  • 1 in 5 have asthma

  • 1 in 10 have dyslexia

  • 1 to 8 in 1,000 have epilepsy

  • 1 in 400 to 1 in 166 have cerebral palsy (2 different sources?)

  • 1 in 20 have attention-deficit disorder

The government/vaccine industry is going to carry on vaccinating, covering up, and making false claims of safety until every child has a vaccine-induced disease. So we of the Genesis 2 Church of Health and Healing must do everything we can to stop this evil, and we will.

611 x gelezen, 0

In Overig

reacties (0)


  • Deva

    www.vaccinvrij.nl is ook een hele mooie site! als mensen een uitleg aan mij vragen waarom ik niet ent geef ik ze altijd die site om door te lezen haha

  • lootjuh

    kwam toevallig hier terecht,ook ik heb mijn zoontje 2 keer laten vaccineren en de 3 de stel ik telkens uit.dit omdat ik van mening ben dat babies te vroeg worden gevaccineerd plus dat mijn zoontje rond 2 maanden en 10 dagen een droge huid kreeg en na de 2 de prik 3 maanden en 10 dagen later eczeem ,ben er gewoon van overtuigd .nu heeft hij homeopatie en wil graag met 8 mnd de laatste geven en idem als bij kliena de bmr helemaal niet.kijk kinderziektes zijn er niet zomaar en sommige kinderziektes kunnen niet kwaad.ook vind ik het zo vreemd dat babies al tetanus prik krijgen en dat terwijl ze nog niet eens op straat spelen of wat dan ook,dus hoe lopen ze het in godsnaam op? denk persoonlijk dat als je alles maar uitroeit en er komt opeens een vreemde ziekte ,het lichaampje het zelf niet meer trekt.en nog steeds laten mensen hun kinderen klakkeloos inspuiten met ziektes want zo is het wel.de eiwitten in de vaccinaties kunnen eczeem geven.en hiervoor was ik bij een kinderarts maar er valt gewoonweg niet over te praten en al die artsen houden de handen boven het hoofd.Het vervelende vind ik wel dat ik niks weet over kinderen die echt ziek zijn geworden zonder vaccinaties en met.zou 10 mei voor de 3 de vaccinatie moeten maar wacht zowieso tot 8 mnd.en wat helemaal erg is dat ze zeggen bij een lage koorts of verkoudheid mag hij gewoon geent worden :O dan is er veel meer risico op complicaties juist.maar goed dit is een eeuwige discussie.maar een keus van de ouder zelf ,liefs

  • kliena

    Wij zijn kritisch wb prikken. Onze zoon krijgt 3x dktp en de andere prikken 1 minder als aanbevolen. BMR krijgt hij helemaal niet. En inderdaad, elke keuze is goed. Als ouder mag je namelijk zelf kiezen. Ook als je het niet met elkaar eens bent..